Clouds of War
Wednesday, March 19, 2003 at 02:53PM
I have refrained from making any public comment about the coming war with Iraq that Australia is about to enter. Partly out of general reticence, partly because the whole matter is very depressing, and partly because my own thoughts and feelings are inarticulate. However, one way to deal with inarticulate thoughts and feelings is to attempt to articulate them, so here I go.
Along with most people, I agree that the Hussein regime is terrible and Iraq would be better off without him. Along with most people, I agree that a full-scale invasion, with cruise missiles, bombs, tanks, infantry, chemical and biological weapons and the consequent death, carnage and destruction is a terrible outcome. But none of this is what depresses me most. What depresses me most is what could have been and how much more sane what could have been compares with what is coming.
Had things gone differently, we would have had stronger international institutions. Instead of the blunt instrument of war and occupation, with all of the historical connotation of western invasions in the region, we would be able to deal with this regime differently. Not just the UN Security Council: that’s clearly a blunt instrument too. What we need is an operative, experienced and powerful international criminal court and an international criminal justice system. If we had this, Saddam Hussein and his regime could be prosecuted for crimes against humanity. If we had a robust international judicial system, we would be able to prosecute criminals and treat them with justice in a way that is also seen to be just. The only convincing reasons I have heard for the invasion and occupation of Iraq are actually better reasons for a police action to detain a criminal and to bring him to justice. If only we had the institutions and practices in place to make this possible. Unfortunately, neither Iraq nor United States signed up for the International Criminal Court (and Australia kicked up a bit of a fuss about it, before eventually signing up) so it appears that they would rather have the bloodshed and confrontation.
News Archive
2002 | 2003 | Beables and Changeables – A Crackpot Index – Don Burrows and Nina Ferro – Meteorologist – 2003 Redesign – News Feed – 2003 Brunswick Music Festival – Zachary and Straw – Thoughts – February Pictures – Spots – Nor W arf Numb E – “Tantrum” – Clouds of War – Learning Negation – Happy Birthday #2! – 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
This is a news item at consequently.org. There are many others at the archive page. You can add comments at the end.
About
I’m Greg Restall, and this is my website. I work in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. Email: greg at consequently.org; Post: School of of Philosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Start at the home page—a summary of the site. The left column is news, archived on the news archive page. The central column contains recent items from the writing page, which lists my publications. These are also categorised by topic. You can follow my links at my account on delicious and occasional short snarky remarks at @consequently on twitter.
To subscribe to this site, either read the full feed 
of everything, the feed of news items only , or the feed of writing items only , which is also great for podcasting pdfs automatically.
This site is handcoded: I write text in Textmate, and Webby files things in the right place and uploads them to the server. This page was last modified on 2009-01-07 at 02:54PM.
Thought
There are two kinds of truths: those of reasoning and those of fact. The truths of reasoning are necessary and their opposite is impossible; the truths of fact are contigent and their opposites are possible.
— Gottfried Leibniz Monadology.