AJL Papers
Thursday, March 30, 2006 at 10:44AM
This morning I uploaded a few new papers to the Australasian Journal of Logic, one of the projects I (mostly!) enjoy working on. It’s an open access, fully refereed, online journal in logic. If you’ve not seen it before, browse around and check it out. Let me know what you think.
One thing that an online journals make possible is the freedom from constraints of filling a fixed number of fixed-size volumes a year. Different ejournals do this differently. At the AJL, we publish one volume per year, but papers appear in the volume whenever they complete the refereeing and editing process. We close the volume at the end of the year, and start a new one in the next year. This means that wherever one paper is in the queue doesn’t block the progress of any other paper. We can publish Tony Roy’s massive 146 page Natural Derivations for Priest An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic without worrying that this will delay the other things in the queue until the next volume. Tony’s paper has meant that we’ve well-and-truly broken our pagecount record for the 2006 volume, and we’re only in March.
News Archive
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | Happy 2006 – Teaching in Semester 1, 2006 – Assorted crosscultural observations, upon visiting the supermarket – Phase Change – Fun with Playlists: Squeezing your music library onto a 2GB iPod – Degrees of Truth, Degrees of Falsity – Masses of Formal Philosophy – Greg Hjorth coming back to Melbourne – Marathon Effort – Last Night at the MCG – Dame Edna at the Commonwealth Games Closing Ceremony – Being a logician means sometimes having to say that you're sorry. Or at least, that you're wrong. – Oh, and there's another paper, too – Spooky coincidence? I think not – AJL Papers – 2006 redesign in progress – Enclosures – The Shifty Salesman – Well, that was easy... – Happy 5 day! – Masses of Formal Philosophy: Question 1 – On the Cable Guy Paradox – On Regret and Slingshots – End of Semester – Interviewed – This football game is pretty tense... – Key Ideas in the theory of proofs #1: The Duality of Proofs and Counterexamples – Teaching in Semester 2, 2006 – Off to France – Here in Nancy, Day 1 – Here in Nancy, Day 2 – Back home – Assorted Observations – Interviewed again – On Politics – On the Interview – Ten Questions about Books – Visits – An idea... – Masses of Formal Philosophy: Question 2 – Party on Tuesday – A Philosophical Poll: on a priori knowledge of possibilities – Horn tooting – Scenes from an afternoon – Off to India... – 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
This is a news item at consequently.org. There are many others at the archive page. You can add comments at the end.
About
I’m Greg Restall, and this is my website. I work in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. Email: greg at consequently.org; Post: School of of Philosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Start at the home page—a summary of the site. The left column is news, archived on the news archive page. The central column contains recent items from the writing page, which lists my publications. These are also categorised by topic. You can follow my links at my account on delicious and occasional short snarky remarks at @consequently on twitter.
To subscribe to this site, either read the full feed 
of everything, the feed of news items only , or the feed of writing items only , which is also great for podcasting pdfs automatically.
This site is handcoded: I write text in Textmate, and Webby files things in the right place and uploads them to the server. This page was last modified on 2009-01-07 at 10:39AM.
Thought
I have no reason for believing the existence of matter. I have no immediate intuition thereof: neither can I immediately, from any sensations, ideas, notions, actions or passions infer an unthinking, unperceiving, inactive substance–either by probable deduction or necessary consequence.
— George Berkeley Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.