This is Greg Restall’s website, with news, writings, links, and bite sized updates. For background look below.

Ten Questions about Books

Saturday, July 29, 2006 at 09:02PM

Since Jo asked so nicely, I’ll add my answers to the one book meme that’s going around the place.

  1. One book that changed your life

    Robert C. Roberts, Spirituality and Human Emotion.

    It’s because of this book that I’m a philosopher, believe it or not. Reading it, I saw that the philosophy needn’t be self-contained, but could be used to say something productive and interesting about matters of human concern. In my undergraduate years I spent a lot of time reading theology, and I learned most from the literature that was philosohpical in technique and in style.

  2. One book you’ve read more than once

    C. S. Lewis, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader.

    My out-and-out favourite of the Narnia Chronicles.

  3. One book you’d want on a desert island

    The Gospel according to John

    Following Jo’s example, I’ll treat different biblical books as different books. For me it’s a toss-up for different gospels, but John’s the one I’m least ‘at home’ with and I think it bears repeated readings, as is fitting on a desert island.

  4. One book that made you laugh

    Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad.

    It’s an intellectual laugh mostly, rather than slapstick, but there are laughs on each page of these wise, knowing, sensitive tales of the robot constructors Trurl and Klaupacius.

  5. One book that made you cry

    David Mitchell, Cloud Atlas.

    A truly vertiginous read: six interlocking stories from the 1850s, through the present, to the near future and after the collapse of civilisation. Deeply moving.

  6. OneTwo books you wish had been written

    Richard Routley, Exploring Meinong’s Jungle & Beyond, the edited version.

    The existing version version is an amazing read, but with a good edit it could have changed the face of philosophy in this country. In a very good way.

    Alan Anderson, Nuel Belnap, J. Michael Dunn and Robert K. Meyer, Entailment, Volume 2.

    The existing Entailment, Vol 2 is very good, but the version that was foreshadowed in the first volume of Entailment would have been fantastic. But that would have required the continuing of the Belnap/Meyer collaboration, which broke down in the 1980s.

  7. One book you wish had never been written

    I find it hard to answer this question, so I’ll interpret it differently.

    David Marr and Marian Wilkinson, Dark Victory.

It is unutterably sad that this book had to be written. I wish that it had been impossible to write because the events had never taken place. Instead, we’ve got to make sure that they never happen again.

  1. One book you’re currently reading

    PD James, The Children of Men.

    I’ve got a thing for well-written dystopias.

  2. One book you’ve been meaning to read

    Colin Tudge, So Shall we Reap.

    I started reading this before the sabbatical last year, and I didn’t take it with me – it’s still lying in my pile of things to read. It’s got a wonderful subtitle: “How Everyone Who Is Liable to Be Born in the Next Ten Thousand Years Could Eat Very Well Indeed; and Why, in Practice, Our Immediate Descendants Are Likely to Be in Serious Trouble”.

  3. Tag five people

    If you’re reading this and want to do write your own answers, consider yourself tagged. Answer the questions on your own blog and link here in the comments, or answer in the comments for yourself.

News Archive

2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | Happy 2006Teaching in Semester 1, 2006Assorted crosscultural observations, upon visiting the supermarketPhase ChangeFun with Playlists: Squeezing your music library onto a 2GB iPodDegrees of Truth, Degrees of FalsityMasses of Formal PhilosophyGreg Hjorth coming back to MelbourneMarathon EffortLast Night at the MCGDame Edna at the Commonwealth Games Closing CeremonyBeing a logician means sometimes having to say that you're sorry. Or at least, that you're wrong.Oh, and there's another paper, tooSpooky coincidence? I think notAJL Papers2006 redesign in progressEnclosuresThe Shifty SalesmanWell, that was easy...Happy 5 day!Masses of Formal Philosophy: Question 1On the Cable Guy ParadoxOn Regret and SlingshotsEnd of SemesterInterviewedThis football game is pretty tense...Key Ideas in the theory of proofs #1: The Duality of Proofs and CounterexamplesTeaching in Semester 2, 2006Off to FranceHere in Nancy, Day 1Here in Nancy, Day 2Back homeAssorted ObservationsInterviewed againOn PoliticsOn the InterviewTen Questions about BooksVisitsAn idea...Masses of Formal Philosophy: Question 2Party on TuesdayA Philosophical Poll: on a priori knowledge of possibilitiesHorn tootingScenes from an afternoonOff to India...2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |

This is a news item at consequently.org. There are many others at the archive page. You can add comments at the end.

About

I’m Greg Restall, and this is my website. I work in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. Email: greg at consequently.org; Post: School of of Philosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.

Start at the home page—a summary of the site. The left column is news, archived on the news archive page. The central column contains recent items from the writing page, which lists my publications. These are also categorised by topic. You can follow my links at my account on delicious and occasional short snarky remarks at @consequently on twitter.

Current CO2 concentration in the atmosphere

To subscribe to this site, either read the full feed  of everything, the feed of news items only , or the feed of writing items only , which is also great for podcasting pdfs automatically.

This site is handcoded: I write text in Textmate, and Webby files things in the right place and uploads them to the server. This page was last modified on 2009-01-07 at 10:24AM.

Thought

There are two kinds of truths: those of reasoning and those of fact. The truths of reasoning are necessary and their opposite is impossible; the truths of fact are contigent and their opposites are possible.
— Gottfried Leibniz Monadology.