“Logical Pluralism and the Preservation of Warrant,” in S. Rahman et al. (eds.) Logic, Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science, pp. 163-173, Kluwer 2004.
I defend logical pluralism against the charge that One True Logic is motivated by considerations of warrant preservation. On the way I attempt to clarify just a little the connections between deductive validity and epistemology.
Author: Greg Restall
Status: Published in 2004
Local file: warrantpres.pdf
(93KB)
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3
Subjects:
I’m Greg Restall, and this is my website. I work in Philosophy at the University of Melbourne. Email: greg at consequently.org; Post: School of of Philosophy, Anthropology and Social Inquiry, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Start at the home page—a summary of the site. The left column is news, archived on the news archive page. The central column is for photos, archived on the occasional photos page. The right column contains recent items from the writing page, which lists my publications. These are also categorised by topic. You can follow my links at my account on delicious and occasional short snarky remarks at @consequently on twitter.
To subscribe to this site, either read the full feed
of everything, the feed of news items only
, or the feed of writing items only
, which is also great for podcasting pdfs automatically.
This site is handcoded: I write text in Textmate, and Webby files things in the right place and uploads them to the server. This page was last modified on 2009-07-20 at 10:22AM.
Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.
— Edward Tufte